Legal means of regulation of memory policy: difficulties and solutions

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article raises the question of whether legal means to resolve issues related to memory policy are appropriate in order to build a social and political consensus around memories of the past related to national identity. Based on the experience of legislative regulation of memory policy in Spain, as well as individual examples of judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the difficulty and sometimes futility of attempts to separate purely legal issues from the complex historical evolution of the situation under consideration is shown.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Natalia Kolotova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: kolotova.n@gmail.com

PhD in Law, Associated Professor Leading Researcher, Acting Head of the Sector of Human Rights

Rússia, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Veltser Kh. Memory as an arena of political struggle // Inviolable reserve. 2005. No. 2. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/2/istoriya-pamyat-i-sovremennost-proshlogo.html (in Russ.).
  2. Galperin M. Politicization of law or legalization of politics? On justibility and the doctrine of the “political question” // International Justice. 2020. No. 4 (36). Pp. 45– 58 (in Russ.).
  3. Grantseva O. E. The Law on the Democratic Memory of Spain: an attempt at consolidation or a new phase of conflict? // Latin American Almanac. 2022. No. 36. Pp. 78, 109 (in Russ.).
  4. Evseev A. P. Political justice: essence, genesis, evolution // Herald of the SPbU. Law. 2020. No. 1. P. 240 (in Russ.).
  5. Evseev A. “Working out the past”: the complexity of judicial cognition // International Justice. 2017. No. 4 (24). Pp. 126, 128 (in Russ.).
  6. “Ilascu and others against Moldova and the Russian Federation” // International Justice. 2013. No. 1 (5). P. 78 (in Russ.).
  7. Przyban I. The diversity of models of transition from authoritarianism to democracy // Society and law: research perspectives: collection of articles / ed.-comp. A. Kondakov. Spb., 2015. Pp. 169, 179 (in Russ.).
  8. Khenkin S. M. Spain: polemics around historical memory // Contours of global transformations. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 73, 76, 79 (in Russ.).
  9. Charnota A. Law, memory and oblivion: regulation of collective memory by quasi-judicial institutions // Society and law: research perspectives: collection of articles / ed.-comp. A. Kondakov. SPb., 2015. Pp. 187, 194, 198, 206, 207 (in Russ.).
  10. Aguilar P. The Spanish Amnesty Law of 1977 in Comparative Perspective: From a Law for Democracy to a Law for Impunity n book: Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 315–335.
  11. An Introduction to Transitional Justice / ed. by O. Simie. London, 2021. Pp. 1–14.
  12. Davis M. Is Spain Recovering its Memory Breaking the Pacto del Olvido // Human Rights Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 27. Iss. 3.
  13. Encarnación Omar G. Democracy Without Justice in Spain: The Politics of Forgetting. Philadelphia, 2014. P. 256.
  14. McDonough P., Bares S., Pina A. L. The Cultural Dynamics of Democratization in Spaine. Ithaca, 2018. Pp. 5–9.
  15. Osiel M. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory and the Law. 2017. 2ed. London, 1997. Pp. 4–10.
  16. Van-Halen J. Memoria democratica Europea. URL: https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/memoria-democratica-europea/ (accessed: 27.07.2024).

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. N. V. Kolotova

Baixar (69KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024