On the Eurasian paradigm of political and legal knowledge

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the problems of the formation of a modern historiographical model of political and legal knowledge, the possibility of its development as a Eurasian paradigm, for the positioning of which there are various past and modern ideological prerequisites. In the context of the spread of various distortions, arbitrary modifications and ideological restrictions in relation to other cultural and civilizational types of development in world history, traditional Western European patterns of legal historiography often turn out to be not only ineffective, but also harmful to ensure sovereign conditions for unlocking the potential and preserving the stability of the civilizational space of Russia. The best elements of historiographical approaches to law and the state accumulated in foreign thought must certainly be preserved, but above all serve to clarify the total capital of Russian and foreign political and legal thought, strengthen the positions of Russian science and literature in solving various kinds of reconstructive historical and philosophical problems.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Vladimir Gorban

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gorbanv@gmail.com

Doctor of Law, Head of the Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law Sector, Head of the Interdisciplinary Center for Philosophical and Legal Studies

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

Sergey Korolev

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: sko.05@mail.ru

Doctor of Law, Professor, Chief Researcher of the International Law Sector

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

参考

  1. Adrianova-Peretz V. P. Ancient Russian literature and folklore. L., 1974 (in Russ.).
  2. Hilarion (Metropolitan of Kiev; XI century). The Word about Law and Grace / reconstruction of ancient Rus. text by L. P. Zhukovskaya; transl., intro., pp. 5–27, by V. Ya. Deryagin; comment. by V. Ya. Deryagin, A. K. Svetozarsky. M., 1994 (in Russ.).
  3. Ilyin I. A. General doctrine of law and the state. M., 2006 (in Russ.).
  4. Kant I. To eternal peace / preparation. the text, [transl. with small abbreviations], introductory articles, pp. 3–22, and conclusion by A. V. Gulyga. M., 1989 (in Russ.).
  5. Kant I. Collected works: in 8 vols. Vol. 3. Criticism of pure reason. M., 1994 (in Russ.).
  6. Collingwood R. J. The idea of history; Autobiography / transl. and comment. by Yu. A. Aseev. M., 1980 (in Russ.).
  7. Propp V. Ya. Historical roots of a fairy tale. SPb., 2021 (in Russ.).
  8. Spektorsky E. V. The problem of social physics in the XVII century: in 2 vols. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).
  9. Schelling F. V.Y. Philosophy of Mythology / transl. from German by V. M. Lineikin. Vol. 1: Introduction to the philosophy of mythology. SPb., 2013 (in Russ.).
  10. Gierke O. Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht. Bd. 1: Rechtsgeschichte der deutschen Genossenschaft. Unveränd. photomechan. Nachdr. der 1. AusgDarmstadt: Wiss. Buchgemeinschaft, 1954.
  11. Hart H. The concept of law. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2012.
  12. Jhering R. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Erster Teil. Leipzig, 1852.
  13. Jhering R. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Teil: Th. 2, Abth. 1. Leipzig, 1854.
  14. Wieacker F. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Entwicklung / Franz Wieacker. 3., durchgesehene Auflage. Göttingen, 2016.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024