Historiographical models of reconstruction Of political and legal doctrines

The article discusses the problems of improving historiographical approaches to the coverage and interpretation of political and legal doctrines. The purpose of the study is to review and summarize the key problems of a general theoretical, methodological and special nature arising in connection with the modern dynamics of the development of the science of the history of political and legal doctrines. As a condition for the formation of universal or universal approaches to the historiography of political and legal thought, which have a generally significant character, a detailed and deeper elaboration of questions about the nature, content and focus of national literatures and other relevant sources is considered, which make it possible to draw up a cultural portrait of the type of development of national political and legal thought and literature covering it. At the same time, taking into account the peculiarities of national models of reconstruction of political and legal thought, it is necessary to pay closer attention to the explanation and interpretation of the concept of law, the use of disciplinary forms of mastering the subject of legal science, a conceptual series in which the main contours of the subject of the history of political and legal thought are fixed, as well as the presence of fundamentally different types of attitude to theoretical knowledge as such (for example, in the face of Anglo-American pragmatism). The study draws attention to fundamentally different methods and forms of describing the history of political and legal thought and its various plots in terms of their literary composition, means of expression, the nature of the existential-linguistic connection, and cultural features.